منابع مشابه
Japanese Negative Polarity Items and Negative Concord
Negative polarity items (NPIs) are a class of expressions whose distribution is restricted to affective contexts, especially to the negative context (Kato (1985)). Examples of the expressions traditionally counted as Japanese negative polarity items are: kessite ('ever'), nannimo ('anything'), daremo (`anyone'), dokomo (`anywhere'), tittomo (`not at all'), and sika ('only') (Ikeya and Kawamori ...
متن کاملLicensing German Negative Polarity Items in LTAG
Our paper aims at capturing the distribution of negative polarity items (NPIs) within lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammar (LTAG). The condition under which an NPI can occur in a sentence is for it to be in the scope of a negation with no quantifiers scopally intervening. We model this restriction within a recent framework for LTAG semantics based on semantic unification. The proposed analysis pr...
متن کاملThe many careers of negative polarity items
Negative polarity items are characterized by their restriction to negative contexts. Ladusaw (1979) proposed that for the most-discussed negative polarity items (NPIs), licensing contexts have to observe the semantic property of being downward entailing (see de Swart 1998, for an accessible introduction). According to a competing analysis, at least some NPIs undergo scalar licensing (Fauconnier...
متن کاملOn the grammaticalization of negative polarity items
0 Introduction The phenomenon of polarity sensitivity is not, in general, very well understood. Why is it that certain words and idioms have the peculiar property of occurring only in negative, interrogative or conditional contexts? It is intuitively clear that negative polarity items (NPIs) are not arbitrarily distributed over the lexicon. A field-worker analyzing an unknown language would pro...
متن کاملNegative Polarity Items in Questions: Strength as Relevance
The traditional approach towards (negative) polarity items is to answer the question in which contexts NPIs are licensed. The inspiring approaches of Kadmon & Landman (1990, 1993) (K&L) and Krifka (1990, 1992, 1995) go a major step further: they also seek to answer the question of why these contexts license NPIs. To explain the appropriate use of polarity items in questions, however, we need to...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Acta Linguistica Asiatica
سال: 2019
ISSN: 2232-3317
DOI: 10.4312/ala.9.1.9-28